top of page

James Cox.

 Professor, Duke Law.

 

In many ways behavioral economics is the most important component of teaching financial legal doctrine. Judges are even beginning to implement it into case law. However, it may just be too complex to yield  meaningful results just yet. Nevertheless, the market is providing solutions to some of the problems behavioralism intends to fix.

2. What will be the consequences of its implementation into financial legal doctrine?

 

1. How does behavioral economics fit with the teaching of financial legal doctrine?

 

3. Are there proposed solutions to the problem of ratings agencies being paid by those they regulate?

 

4. Are "safe havens" being increasingly woven into the law, and how else may we deter wrongdoing?

 

bottom of page